Format guide

ZIP, RAR, and 7z encryption compared

The extension is only the beginning. Encryption family, header visibility, archive structure, and file integrity determine what a forgotten-password case can realistically do next.

ZIP

Two common protection families

Recovery guide

ZIP is a container, not a single encryption method. Identify the protected entry before choosing a recovery path; a known-plaintext option may exist for suitable ZipCrypto archives, while AES ZIP relies on candidate verification.

Legacy ZipCrypto or WinZip AES
Headers may remain visible
Entries can have different states
WinRAR logo; RAR format

RAR

Generation and volumes matter

Recovery guide

RAR recovery is not one workflow. Identify the generation, collect every volume, and separate a checksum failure from a missing part or wrong password before testing candidates.

RAR3/RAR4 and RAR5 differ
Split and solid archives need context
Checksum can mean password or damage
7-Zip logo

7z

AES-256 with optional header encryption

Recovery guide

7z commonly protects data with AES-256 and can encrypt headers, which explains an apparently empty listing. Confirm the container and split parts before treating a 'cannot open' or data error as a password issue.

Filenames may be hidden
Parameters are stored in the archive
Data errors can be integrity failures

The same rule applies to every format

Preserve the original, verify the container, gather all volumes, write down password clues, and confirm any result by extracting expected files. No format label makes a random password guaranteed to recover, and no repair tool can recreate bytes that are missing.

Read the recovery workflow